For any entrepreneur or investor looking to enter the European solar module manufacturing market, the choice of location is a critical decision with long-term consequences. The Baltic states—Latvia and Lithuania—frequently appear on shortlists thanks to their strategic position within the EU, skilled workforce, and competitive business environments.
While geographically close and culturally similar, a deeper analysis reveals significant differences in their operational cost structures that will impact a factory’s profitability. This analysis moves beyond surface-level comparisons to model the key operational expenditures (OPEX) for a solar module factory in each country. Understanding these nuances is the first step in transforming a business concept into a viable, competitive enterprise.

Understanding Key Operational Expenditures (OPEX) in Solar Manufacturing
While the initial investment in manufacturing equipment is a major capital expense (CAPEX), ongoing operational costs determine a facility’s long-term financial health. For a solar module factory, the most significant and variable OPEX components are labor, energy, and logistics. These factors directly influence the final cost per module and the overall competitiveness of the business. Investors must analyze these variables not just for their current state, but for their potential volatility down the road.
Comparative Analysis: Labor Costs
Labor is often the most significant operational expense after raw materials. Both Latvia and Lithuania offer a highly educated and technically proficient workforce, but their wage structures are a clear point of difference.
Based on Q4 2023 data for the manufacturing sector, the average gross monthly wage in Latvia is approximately €1,550. In Lithuania, the average is notably higher at around €1,980.
For a typical 50 MW semi-automated production line requiring approximately 40 employees (including technicians, operators, and administrative staff), this wage gap becomes substantial.
- Latvia Model: 40 employees x €1,550/month = €62,000 per month (€744,000 annually).
- Lithuania Model: 40 employees x €1,980/month = €79,200 per month (€950,400 annually).
This preliminary calculation, before considering employer taxes and social contributions, shows a potential annual labor cost advantage of over €200,000 in Latvia. However, investors must also consider labor availability. In our consulting experience, for example, securing senior-level technicians has sometimes required a more extensive search, a factor that can moderate this direct cost advantage.
Comparative Analysis: Energy Costs
Solar module manufacturing is an energy-intensive process, with machines like laminators and cell stringers running for extended periods. This makes stable and competitively priced electricity a non-negotiable factor.
According to Eurostat data from the second half of 2023, the costs for medium-sized industrial consumers were:
- Latvia: €0.145 per kWh
- Lithuania: €0.138 per kWh
While this difference appears small, it accumulates over millions of kilowatt-hours consumed annually. For a factory operating two shifts, annual consumption can easily exceed 1,000,000 kWh. This gives Lithuania a slight but measurable edge, potentially saving several thousand euros per year on electricity. Investors should also investigate the stability of the national grid and the country’s energy strategy, as these factors can influence long-term price trends.
Comparative Analysis: Logistics and Supply Chain
A factory’s efficiency depends on its ability to smoothly import raw materials (glass, cells, aluminum frames) and export finished modules, making robust port infrastructure and overland transport networks paramount.
The World Bank’s 2023 Logistics Performance Index (LPI) provides a useful benchmark, scoring countries on a scale of 1 to 5.
- Latvia: LPI score of 3.1
- Lithuania: LPI score of 3.4
Lithuania’s higher score reflects strong performance in infrastructure and customs efficiency. Its port of Klaipėda is a major, ice-free regional hub. Latvia offers three major ports (Riga, Ventspils, Liepāja), which provide excellent access to Scandinavian and Northern European markets.
The choice will likely depend on an investor’s target market. A business focused on supplying Germany and Poland might find Lithuania’s road and rail connections more advantageous. An enterprise targeting Scandinavia, on the other hand, may benefit from Latvia’s established shipping routes.
A Note on Corporate Taxation
Direct taxation is another key factor in a factory’s net profitability. Here, the two countries have distinct policies:
- Latvia: 20% corporate income tax, but it is only levied on distributed profits (dividends). Reinvested profits are not taxed, which can be highly advantageous for a growing business.
- Lithuania: A standard 15% corporate income tax rate, which is one of the lowest in the EU.
The optimal structure depends on the business’s financial strategy—whether the priority is reinvesting all earnings for rapid expansion (favoring Latvia’s model) or distributing profits to shareholders (favoring Lithuania’s lower standard rate).
Synthesizing the Data: A Model Scenario
To illustrate the combined impact of these variables, we can model the estimated annual costs for a hypothetical 50 MW factory. This simplified model highlights the trade-offs an investor must weigh.

The visualization shows a clear picture: Latvia offers a significant advantage in labor costs, while Lithuania is more competitive on corporate tax and holds a slight edge in energy and logistics. The ‘better’ choice is not absolute; it depends entirely on an investor’s specific business model and strategic priorities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What are the typical staffing needs for a small to medium-sized solar factory?
A semi-automated 50 MW production line typically requires 30 to 45 employees spread across one or two shifts, including skilled machine operators, quality control personnel, maintenance technicians, and administrative staff.
How do these Baltic countries compare to manufacturing in Germany?
While Germany offers an exceptional industrial ecosystem and brand prestige (‘Made in Germany’), its labor and energy costs are substantially higher. For many investors, the Baltic states provide a compelling balance of EU-level quality standards and a more competitive operational cost structure.
Are there language barriers for foreign management?
English is widely spoken in the business and technical sectors of both countries, especially among the younger, university-educated workforce. As a result, communication for management and technical training is rarely a significant obstacle.
Is it necessary to have a technical background to start a solar factory?
No, it’s not a prerequisite. Many successful investors in this field come from business, finance, or other industries. The key is to partner with an experienced technical consultant who can manage the planning, equipment procurement, and setup of a turnkey solar production line, ensuring the facility meets international standards from day one.
Conclusion: Making an Informed Decision
The decision between Latvia and Lithuania for establishing a solar module factory is a nuanced one. Latvia presents a compelling case for businesses where labor constitutes the largest share of operational expenses. Its unique corporate tax system further benefits companies focused on aggressive reinvestment and growth.
On the other hand, Lithuania offers a more favorable standard tax rate, slightly cheaper energy, and a marginally superior logistics infrastructure, which may appeal to businesses prioritizing lean operations and efficient distribution to major EU markets.
Ultimately, this analysis serves as a crucial starting point. A final decision should be based on a detailed feasibility study, including site visits, supplier negotiations, and a comprehensive financial model tailored to the specific project. By understanding these fundamental cost drivers, investors can ask the right questions and build a more resilient and profitable manufacturing operation.







